You Can’t Tell the Players Without a Scorecard

2009’s District 9 in which members of an extraterrestrial race line up for food in a militarized refugee camp.

The book Round Trip to America: The Immigrants Return to Europe, 1880-1930, by Mark Wyman, explains how millions of immigrants weren’t “immigrants” at all.
They were migrants.
Although there were 20 million migrations between 1890-1924, the return rate for that period averaged 35%, and many “immigrants” crossed the ocean back and forth several times.
Regions with the highest return rates were Southern Italy (60%), Romania (66%), and Slovakia (57%).
Between 1908-1923, 60% of Southern Italians returned to Italy (969,754 Italians out of 1,624,353).
Migrants labored in U.S. mines and stockyards, sweated in factories, and built U.S. transportation systems, but then traveled back home.
Many never considered living in the U.S. long-term, or becoming citizens. 

One reason for returning home was that although American wages were higher, the working conditions were worse.
In 1895, Chicago stockyard workers—mostly migrants—labored alongside children in rooms “flooded with water, foul smells, smoke, and steam” for 10 hours a day and 16 cents an hour (the equivalent of $5.86 per hour today).
Children made half that amount.
25% of the immigrant workers at the Carnegie Steel South Works (in Pittsburg) died or were injured between 1907-1910.
According to Round Trip to America, “travelers on returning ships were repeatedly struck by the large numbers of injured, broken, or ill immigrants on board and the multiplicity of widows.” 

Another reason for people returning home was nativist resentment.
One line from the poem by Emma Lazarus describes immigrants as “the wretched refuse of your teaming shore,” and that’s how migrants—especially those from southern Europe—were perceived.
An immigration inspector claimed in 1887 that the U.S. was “now receiving installments of the ignorant and degraded, a class that is little superior to the Digger Indians of the West.”
(“Digger Indians” is a derogatory term that was created to facilitate Manifest Destiny.)
More than 125 years later, former president Trump proclaimed (in 2023) that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.”

As soon as many immigrants recognized what they were getting into, a good share (especially those who wanted to stay) stopped working for others, and became entrepreneurs.
The first millionaire American (from 1810 until his death in 1831) was Stephen Girard—a banker and shipowner who was born in France.
In the 1920’s and 30’s, many immigrants started their own grocery stores, bakeries and butcher shops.
Other immigrants founded small toy and food-stuff factories—idea-based businesses.
In 2023, immigrants are still the principal force behind new American businesses.

“Forgotten man” and former socialite Godfrey Park (William Powell) wasn’t an immigrant, but he was “down on his luck” in 1936’s My Man Godfrey.

As Alexis de Tocqueville noted in the 1830’s: “in no country in the world are private fortunes more precarious than in the U.S.
It is not uncommon for the same man in the course of his life to rise and sink again through all the grades that lead from opulence to poverty.”
Fortunes are still precarious, in this modern country.

Christopher Columbus (Gerard Depardieu) in 1492: Conquest of Paradise—a film that concealed (rather than revealed) many disturbing facts about his treatment of Native Americans.

The Columbus Day holiday had an interesting origin.
It began in 1891, when eleven dark-skinned Sicilian immigrants were lynched in New Orleans.
(There were false rumors that the Sicilians had been “let off,” after killing a white man.)
Italian consulates throughout the U.S. were incensed.
A year later, President Harrison helped create a holiday that would kill two birds with one stone.
It would honor the 400th anniversary of the “discovery of America,” and help Italians enter the mainstream of American society. 

A lobby card for 1944’s Fighting Sullivans, a film about five Irish-American brothers who died fighting for their country in WWII. It’s a myth that after the Sullivan brothers died, siblings were prevented from serving together.

During the Civil War, 25% of the men in the Union Army were immigrants, and another 25% were first-generation Americans.
During WWI, 18% of the U.S. soldiers were immigrants.
Detailed counts (on origins) weren’t kept for WWII.
However, Italian-American soldiers comprised at least 10% of the volunteers, and Polish-American soldiers at least 8% (far above their percentages in the U.S. population).
Scores of first generation Irish and German Americans volunteered to fight on the Allied side in WWII, seeking to prove their patriotism.

The current immigration policy is supposed to be based on three main factors—family reunification, labor market needs, and diversity.
The system is being overwhelmed, however, by asylum seekers (many bringing children).

According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the U.S. has a labor shortage.
More workers—skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled—are needed in many fields: medicine, agriculture, hospitality, teaching, construction and manufacturing.
On the other hand, American business seems determined to widen the salary gap between upper management and blue-collar jobs, so many of the available jobs don’t pay very well.

Immigration is a very difficult issue.
An article by the Cato Institute in 2021 called the present system “archaic and barely coherent.”
An article on the Brookings Institute website, in 2023,* tells us that 80% of new technical jobs will go unfilled.
Are we allowing for asylum-seekers who may just want to work here, and find safety for their families?
Is it possible to recreate the immigration system so it isn’t tainted by nativism and prejudice?

* “Industrial Policy Will Require Immigration Reform,” Greg Wright and Emma Berman, September 29, 2023.

Gimmie, Gimmie, Gimmie—A Story of Entitlement

Alexander Hamilton (Derryl Yeager) and James Madison (Craig Wasson) in a scene from 1989’s A More Perfect Union: America becomes a Nation.

Article 1, Section 2, of the Constitution, stated which people would be counted to determine the number of Representatives (for each state) in the House, and for taxation purposes.
This was an important number because it gave states power within the Federal Government.
Southern states, with large slave populations, wanted extra power.
However, they didn’t want slaves to be thought of as more than chattel.
As a result, the “Three-Fifths Compromise” was devised in 1787.

The counted people were free (white) men, women, and children, including “those bound to service for a term of years.”
Thus, indentured (white) servants were considered “free.”
(Indentured servitude ended for the most part in 1864, but it wasn’t abolished until 1917.)

The people to be excluded were “Indians not taxed” (Native Americans living in tribal territories) and “three-fifths of all other persons.”
“All other persons” meant slaves.
Thus, a few free Black people were counted as people; but enslaved people were counted as three-fifths of one person, for House Representation and tax purposes.

The 14th Amendment repealed the Three-Fifths Compromise in 1868, but Native Americans living in tribal territories were still excluded from representation.
Twenty years later, the Dawes Act allowed citizenship to those Native Americans who owned land.
However, all Native Americans weren’t declared citizens until 1924.
According to Jefferson and the Indians, by Anthony F. C. Wallace, the Cherokees asked for citizenship as early as 1808.

Newton Knight (Matthew McConnaughey) shows his common-law wife Rachel (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) how to shoot in Free State of Jones.

Stephen Budiansky’s The Bloody Shirt: Terror After the Civil War, quotes an address by the Provisional Governor Benjamin F. Perry to the South Carolina constitutional convention in 1865—the early days of Reconstruction.
Perry proclaimed that “to be no longer a slave in no way made the Negro a citizen,” and “this is a white man’s government, intended for white men only. . . To speak of extending political equality to the Negro was nothing but folly and madness.”

Although Perry was mandated by President Johnson to end slavery in his state, he was making sure that the convention of “gentlemen” knew that only they were entitled to full political equality.
South Carolina remained a “white man’s government” for decades after 1865, because Southern men thought it “madness” to elevate Blacks “to the dignity of the white man.”

Panel from a comic book, approved by George Wallace, used to promote segregation in Alabama during his 1960 campaign for Governor.

In George Wallace’s 1963 inaugural address (as governor of Alabama), Wallace declared that “in the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth” he would protect “separate racial stations” with “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”
(The libraries and schools for Black Alabama children would NOT be as well provided for as those for white children.
However, there would be libraries and schools of some mean sort.)
All over this country, there are still big differences between schools and libraries in exclusively Black neighborhoods versus those in White neighborhoods.

Ernest Burkhart and Mollie Kyle (Leonardo DiCaprio and Lily Gladstone) in Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon.

The film Killers of the Flower Moon (based on the David Grann book) is scheduled to be released on October 20th.
It’s about members of the Osage tribe being murdered for oil money.
I’ve read that David Grann outlines the back story.
The Osage tribes, and the U.S., made a treaty in 1808 in which they were to be protected on a portion of their own land.
A few years later, the Government broke its’ word and moved them to Kansas.
After Kansas became popular with white settlers, the Osage were moved (once more) to Oklahoma, where oil was found, making them wealthy.
The local white power structure, of the 1920s, felt that only they were entitled to the wealth of the land. Therefore, many people were murdered.

Although immigrants were categorized as “exotic novelties” down to “wretched refuse (of your teaming shore),” being an immigrant didn’t stand in the way of gaining wealth.
Between 1815-1860, the three richest men in the U.S.—Frenchman Stephen Girard, German-born John Jacob Astor, and Irishman Alexander Turney Stewart—were all immigrants.
Immigrants are still among the wealthiest people: Chinese-born Eric Yuan, South African-born Elon Musk, and Nigerian-born Tope Awotona, among others.
According to recent study,* immigrants are 80% more likely to found companies, than those born in the U.S.
(Perhaps, the main reason immigrants start new companies is because it’s impossible to get ahead working for others.)

Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas) proclaiming “Greed, for lack of a better word, is good,” in 1987’s Wall Street.

For generations, there was more economic disparity between rich and poor in Europe, than in the U.S.
However, the balance shifted dramatically around 1980.
Wealth and Democracy: A Political History of the American Rich, by Kevin Phillips, analyzes how the superrich have harvested privileges—at the expense of the lower and middle classes—despite the U.S. being a democratic society.
Wealth and Democracy was written twenty years ago.
In 2002, CEOs made 145 times as much as a typical worker.
By 2022, CEOs made 344 times as much as a typical worker.
Now, the average Fortune 500 CEO salary is $15.9 million a year, while the average worker salary is $61,900 a year.

When people speak up for unions, parity, and a safety net, they’re dismissed as communists.
However, cut-throat Darwinian capitalism was never a good fit with democracy.
It dismisses the worker as just a cog, and raises up the “job-creators” above all others.
(Consumers are the true job-creators.)
This isn’t a battle between capitalism and communism; it’s a battle of entitlement. 

Eleanor Roosevelt, First Lady of the United States, 1933-1945. 

Former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt died in November of 1962.
In one of her last essays “The Social Revolution,” published in Tomorrow is Now, she discusses issues that are still crucial today: 

It is this minority of strident and prejudiced people, with their unwillingness to accept race equality—at whatever cost—who provide the Communists with most of their ammunition against the democratic system, who are loudest in their expression of hatred for Communism. . .this recurring matter of labeling “Communist” anyone who does not agree with you is essentially an act of dishonesty and it should be nailed every time for what it is.

*”Immigration and Entrepreneurship in the United States,” Azoulay, Jones, Kim, and Miranda, Vol. 4, No.1, March 2022, American Economic Review: Insights.

A Mad Raging Womb

I didn’t cover whether being a woman made you more likely to be considered “mad” in last week’s memorandum—“Fit to be Tied (in a Straitjacket).”
For centuries this was so, but the situation is slightly better today.

From left to right, Judy Bernly (Jane Fonda); Violet Newstead (Lily Tomlin); Franklin Hart (Dabney Coleman); and Doralee Rhodes (Dolly Parton) in a scene from the 1980 comedy (about women being demeaned in a white-collar workplace), Nine to Five.

There are more women than men in the U.S., and more women than men are college-educated.
Yet, women run only 10.4% of Fortune 500 companies; and make up only 28% of the current (118th) Congress.
(These are considered “wins” because the Fortune 500 number hovered at 8% for several years, and 28% of Congress is the highest percentage ever.)

For twenty years, 2002-2022, American women (on average) have earned about 80 cents for every dollar earned by men.
(Women sometimes begin their careers at close to wage parity, but lose ground as they age.)
When the average is broken out by race and ethnicity, Black women earned 70 cents for every dollar, and Hispanic women earned 65 cents for every dollar earned by white men.
Companies don’t want employees to discuss salaries in the workplace mainly so women won’t find out how much more men are making than women.

Essentially, there are certain viewpoints about men and women that have been accepted since Greek and Roman times.
Women are viewed as less capable of rational thought and weaker emotionally than men.
To be a real “man” is to be considered strong, logical, and capable.
To be a “woman” is the opposite.
No matter how our own experiences make these ideas ridiculous, this set of beliefs still permeates our religions and Western philosophy.

Virginia Cunningham (Olivia de Havilland) in the center of a group of patients in 1948’s The Snake Pit.
According to the IMDb trivia on this film, at least 13 states changed their mental health laws after this film was released.

When films have dealt with lobotomy, they’ve usually portrayed men: poet Samson Shilitoe in 1966’s A Fine Madness; angry veteran Randle McMurphy in 1975’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest; and traumatized US Marshall, Teddy Daniels in 2010’s Shutter Island.
However, in most countries, between 60%-75% of lobotomy patients were women.
(In the U.S., the percentage was 75%.)
Lobotomy (the process of severing the cerebral nerve tracts) was praised for making women more compliant and “feminine.”

Penelope Hildern (Lorna Heilbron) in The Creeping Flesh. The story involves a paleontological skeleton, and an insane mother and daughter. This 1973 horror film is set in the Victorian era, and stars Peter Cushing (as her father) and Christopher Lee (as the madhouse administrator).

Men have long equated female sexuality and madness,
In the 5th century BC, Hippocrates originated the term “hysteria”
(The Greek word “hystera” means “uterus.”), and “hysterical fits” have been discussed ever since.
Flemish doctor Jean Baptist van Helmont asserted, in the 1600’s, that “women are more inclined to madness, depression, and bewitching or enchantment than men because of the influence of the ‘mad raging womb.’”
In the 1860’s, British Dr. Isaac Baker Brown thought he could “correct women’s functional disorders” by removing their sexual organs (for example, the clitoris or their ovaries).
The very influential British psychiatrist Dr. Henry Maudsley claimed, in 1911, that “uterine changes lead to an unstable brain.” 

In the past, asylums were used as a method to control women—especially wealthy women—enabling their male relatives to control that wealth.
(The image of the “mad” beautiful woman has long been romanticized.)
In 1799, famed English actress, author and royal mistress Mary Robinson wrote The Natural Daughter with Portraits of the Leadenhead Family, in which the lead character (Mrs. Morley) is falsely imprisoned in a madhouse.
Mrs. Morley is eventually able to free herself, and her own mother, from the asylum.

Still from 1948 film The Woman in White with Laura Fairlie (Eleanor Parker) and Count Fosco (Sydney Greenstreet).

Wilkie Collins wrote The Woman in White, in which hero Walter Hartright rescues a beautiful woman who has been drugged and carted off to an asylum, in order that her estate be inherited by Count Fosco’s friend.
The 1859 novel has been adapted multiple times.
The earliest play version was performed in 1860, and Andrew Lloyd Webber staged a musical version in 2004.
The earliest film version was a 1912 silent, and the most recent adaptation was a BBC five-part TV series in 2018.

Jessica Lange was nominated (in 1983) for a Best Actress Oscar for playing Frances Farmer in the movie Frances.
This film tells the story of Frances Farmer—a 1930’s film actress who was ostracized, institutionalized and lobotomized because she wanted to play by her own rules.
(There’s some confusion as to whether Farmer was actually lobotomized, but she was definitely held in a mental institution.) 

Mary Todd Lincoln (Sally Field) in 2012’s Lincoln. Mrs. Lincoln gave birth to four sons, but only one child outlived her.
She was holding her husband’s hand when he was assassinated.

That middle class, and wealthy, women were committed to asylums in the 1800’s (mainly by close relatives)—is well documented.*
In 1876, the former First Lady, Mary Todd Lincoln, spent time in a private asylum.
Her last remaining son (Robert) had her committed because he believed she was having delusions, and because she spent money on unnecessary household goods—especially draperies and gloves.
(Mary Lincoln smuggled letters out to good lawyers, and notified the press.
After three months, she was released to the custody of her sister.)

Slowly, as the courts gave women more rights—and men had less financial control over their wives and mothers—the “tool,” of incarceration in madhouses, was used less often.
The 1974 Fair Credit Opportunity Act gave women the right to a credit card.
The Supreme Court ruling, Kirchberg vs Feenstra (1981), gave women some control of marital property, when the Louisiana “Head and Master Law” was disallowed.
(Recently, another Supreme Court ruling deprived women of their rights. In June of 2022, the Court overturned Roe vs Wade—the 1973 law which gave women the right to an abortion.)

Currently, the numbers have improved—with 50.8% of the people in mental hospitals being women—almost 50/50.
Yet, according to the National Institute of Mental Health, 27.2% of women experience mental health problems, while only 18.1% of men do.
(Perhaps, the reason is because women are more interested in changing their behavior, as well as more willing to seek help from doctors and psychiatrists.)

White, heterosexual men—especially of Northern European descent—are at the top of the caste system in American society.
Women, along with other groups and colors of people, are on lower rungs of the class structure.
As long as white men play their roles (or pretend to), they’ll keep their freedom, earn more, and retain their privileges.
Stepping outside those “norms,” however, may lead to varying degrees of social censure (including incarceration).

*Lunacy in the 19th Century: Women’s Admission to Asylums in United States of America, by Katharine Pouba and Ashley Tiamen, http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/6687

Fit to be Tied (in a Straitjacket)

Korean War vet Randle McMurphy (Jack Nicholson) thought he could control his situation (by transferring from prison to a mental hospital) in 1975’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.

When I look up the word “mad” in my 1984 Webster’s dictionary, the first definition is “afflicted with a mental disorder, or insane.”

The second is “enthusiastic” (as in “mad about something”).
The third definition is “angry and resentful.”
(Some dictionaries on the web switch definitions one and three.)
“Insane” is defined as “afflicted with a serious mental disorder impairing a person’s ability to function.”

We live in social environments, and we function in those environments with varying degrees of success.
People—especially those who live in big cities—are used to living with street people who don’t seem to be functioning well at all.
I lived in New York City from 1972-1999.
While I lived there, I routinely listened to a woman chatting on an imaginary phone in our local Post Office.
I was harangued by a naked woman near Penn Station, and nearly knocked into the street by a homeless man on the Bowery.
On multiple occasions, in Turtle Bay, I saw a man wrapped in blankets clucking like a chicken.
As I walked to work, I concluded that living in New York was like being in a giant pressure cooker, and some individuals couldn’t hack it.

R.D. Laing (David Tennant) addressing his audience in the 2017 film Mad to be Normal.

Michael Gabon and Gabriel Byrne played patients.

Psychiatrist R.D. Laing was known for rejecting surgery, electroconvulsive therapy, and most medications to treat mental illnesses.
He wrote The Divided Self in 1960. (I remember attending one of his lectures, probably in the late 1970’s, and Tennant’s performance brings back memories of that occasion.)

In The Divided Self, Dr. Laing said: 

When I certify someone insane, I am not equivocating when I write that he is of unsound mind, may be dangerous to himself and others, and requires care and attention in a mental hospital. However, at the same time, I am also aware that, in my opinion, there are other people who are regarded as sane, whose minds are as radically unsound, who may be equally or more dangerous to themselves or others and whom society does not regard as psychotic and fit persons to be in a madhouse.

Essentially, Dr. Laing was saying that it’s difficult to determine what behaviors are “mad,” since people are reacting to difficult circumstances.
Sometimes, it can just be a matter of what behaviors we are willing to accept from others, or who is in societal control.

Hollywood movie actress Frances Farmer (Jessica Lange) had strong political viewpoints.
According to the screenplay for 1982’s Frances, she ended up being lobotomized in a mental hospital.

Dealing with “mad” people is a problem in communities, especially as cities became larger.
It’s disturbing to be physically threatened by “unpredictable” people, and this frequently happens in cities.
However, since curing people was not an option, locking them up in asylums became the solution.
John Higg’s book, William Blake vs. the World, mentions the London Vagrancy Act of 1714.
It dictated that “homeless people who appeared to have lost their reason could be restrained and confined.”

One of Glenda Jackson’s first film roles was as a madwoman pretending to be assassin Charlotte Corday in 1967’s Marat/Sade—about inmates in the Charenton asylum performing a play for French society.

Confining people was the purpose of asylums like Bedlam (the London hospital founded in 1247), and Charenton (the Paris hospital established in 1645).
Bedlam was also once one of London’s leading tourist attractions.
Londoners, and tourists alike, enjoyed the “antics” of unfortunate patients until 1770—when the practice of displaying patients in a “human zoo” officially ended.

Before a person could be confined to Bedlam, an admission form was filled out.
One question was whether the prospective patient was “melancholy, raving, or mischievous.”
Of course, “raving” and “mischievous” patients were more of a problem for madhouse managers, than melancholy ones.
Raving patients often needed to be held in chains, and were sometimes very loud. 

By the late 1700’s, doctors began to experiment more with actually curing mental disease.
George III, the King of England from 1760-1820, was “treated” for his mental illness with bloodletting, being placed in a straitjacket, and caustic poultices.
Other than the introduction of talk therapy and hypnosis (1890s), the treatment of mentally ill people didn’t change much until the introduction of psychosurgery and electroshock therapies in the late 30’s.
In the 40’s, insulin comas were induced are a “cure.”

In 1946’s Bedlam, Nell Bowen (Anna Lee) challenges conditions at the asylum, and is herself committed to the madhouse by evil George Sims (Boris Karloff, on far left).

(Anna Lee played wealthy matriarch Lila Quartermaine for decades in General Hospital.)

Great and Desperate Cures, by Elliot S. Valenstein, tells the story of lobotomy*—and other radical treatments—for mental illness.
Lobotomy (surgical severance of cerebral nerve tracts) was first introduced in 1935; its’ main purpose was to pacify patients.
Electroshock therapy also began to be used around that time, mainly for depression.
Until psychotropic drugs were developed in the 1950’s, these treatments were widely used to control patient behavior.

According to Valenstein’s book—in the four years between 1949-1952—at least 20,000 lobotomies were performed in the U.S. alone.
(However, Britannica says it was more like 50,000.)
Many surgeries were performed by Dr. Walter Jackson Freeman II—a doctor who helped popularize lobotomy, and helped transform it from a hospital procedure to a “simple office” procedure. 

Dr. Freeman performed lobotomies on patients as young as four, and also on dementia patients.
He performed his last lobotomy in February of 1967.
(This was the third lobotomy he performed on this particular patient; he’d also operated on her in 1946 and 1956.)
However, the third time wasn’t “the charm.”
He accidentally caused a hemorrhage, and she died.

Over the years, doctors stopped using icepicks for lobotomies and started directing electrodes into brain targets.
By the time Great and Desperate Cures was published in 1985, lobotomy was in disrepute, but occasional psychosurgeries were being performed.
Forms of psychosurgery, and electroshock, are still being used today, but to a limited degree.

Perhaps, because the surgery involves the human brain—the seat of creativity—creatives have been fascinated by the idea of lobotomy.
In 1966’s A Fine Madness (novel and screenplay by Elliott Baker) poet Samson Shilitoe (Sean Connery) undergoes a prefrontal lobotomy.
Most of us remember 1975’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (based on a 1962 novel by Ken Kesey), which portrays both psychosurgery and electroshock therapy.
In 1994’s The Shadow (set in the 30’s) villain Shiwan Khan ends up with part of his frontal lobe excised.
Martin Scorsese’s 2010 film Shutter Island (set in the 50’s) also deals with this subject, but it would be a crime to explain the plot, if you haven’t seen the film.

Push comes to shove when people assume that they are functioning well enough, but society thinks they are NOT.
That’s when policemen and psychiatrists step in, mentally ill people are killed or seriously injured (sometimes, as they seek help), psychotropic medications are prescribed, and patients were once given electroshock treatments, lobotomized, or placed in padded rooms and straitjackets.

Today, the country is polarized.
On one side there are Trump supporters who believe Democrats are “brainwashed by mainstream media,” and “evil” by nature.
On the other side, there are Independents, Democrats and RINOs who are baffled as to why people still follow a person like Trump.
Terms—like derangement, brainwashed, insane, psychopathic, unstable, crazy, idiotic, mad and evil—are tossed around.
(Listen for these words as you watch Sunday morning news shows.)
Each side can’t figure out why the “other side” thinks the way they do, and so they consider the opposing side’s “strange and unacceptable thinking” to be “mad.”
Thank goodness, TPTB no longer believe “mad thoughts” can be excised through surgery.

*In Great and Desperate Cures, Valenstein describes a lobotomy: “after drilling two or more holes in a patient’s skull, a surgeon inserted into the brain. . .instruments. . . often without being able to see what he was cutting, destroyed parts of the brain.” (Lobotomy was a very imprecise business.)

A 40,000-book Personal Library

I recently read Packing My Library: An Elegy and Ten Digressions by Alberto Manguel.
However, I was left with two burning questions after finishing the book: where did his library end up, and how large was the collection that he packed up?
Wikipedia (not Packing My Library) gave me the answers.
Alberto Manguel donated his 40,000-book collection to the Center for Research in the History of Reading, in Lisbon, Portugal.

Alberto Manguel is a novelist, translator, editor, reviewer, and library director.
Over his life, he’s lived in at least eight countries—Argentina, Canada, Israel, France, England, Tahiti, Mexico and the United States (New York City).
I wonder how many times he’s packed up his books, and how long some sections of his collection have been in storage?

The burning of the Library of Alexandria.

I especially enjoyed the ten digressions in Packing My Library.
One digression is about the Library of Alexandria, which some historians say was consumed in a fire started by Julius Caesar’s troops in 48 B.C.
Manguel believes, however, that only the overflow of books (near the port), was actually set aflame.
He considers the great library’s actual fate to be a mystery.
The digression mentions some of the great plays that were lost forever with the destruction of the Library of Alexandria—72 by Euripides, between 63-73 by Aeschylus, and 116 by Sophocles.

Scene from Games of Thrones, showing the vast library of the Citadel.

My husband and I are long-time bibliophiles.

However, our combined libraries aren’t even close to 40,000 books.
One of our brother-in-law’s parents were both librarians, and their joint collection (all left to him after his parents died), was once bigger than ours.
It was never close to 40,000 either.
I think I understand why Mr. Manguel packed up all his books.
He was in his early 70’s when, for various reasons, he had to give up the large space (in France) which had held his spectacular collection.
He needed to make sure that his books had a good home—a home that he could visit, on occasion—but not one that he owned, or paid rent on.

Manga version of Marie Kondo’s The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up.

A few years back, Marie Kondo (Konmari) wrote The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up—all about how we should only have items around us that we truly need.

As a result, I do attempt (periodically), to “prune” my book collection.
(We only have so many walls, and we need room for new books.)
I go through each shelf and follow her advice—deciding if each book “brings me joy.”
Some books bring so much joy, that they’re added to the stack near my bed.
Others don’t, so I place them in a box to be donated.
(I find that I miss certain books years after I’ve donated them.)

Cover of Margareta Magnusson’s The Gentle Art of Swedish Death Cleaning.

Another book on the subject of possessions—and having enough space for them—is Margareta Magnusson’s The Gentle Art of Swedish Death Cleaning: How to Free Yourself and Your Family from a Lifetime of Clutter.
One point in Magnusson’s book is: “Someone will have to clean up after you.
Whoever it may be will find it a burden.”
Her book made me worry about what would happen to our treasured book collections, if my husband and I died together, not separately.
What would our families do with our valued books?
(None love books quite as much as we do.)
Would our carefully-selected books be donated to a library?
Would they be sold?
Would lovely older editions be tossed in an alley, and only the newer books given good homes?

According to a March 2023 Gallup poll, Americans say that they read less than 13 books a year—the smallest number since 1990.*
Reading among subgroups—like the college-educated—is going down more rapidly.
A few famous people (like Bill Gates) say they read over 50 books a year.
(That’s a number my husband and I are comfortable with.)
However, other well-known people (like Kanye West and Donald Trump), brag that they don’t enjoy books, and have never read for personal pleasure.

My husband and I both realize that to be a lover of books—to the extent of owning a lot of them, or carrying them about—is to be an “oddball.”
The purchaser of our condo, a few years back, refused to buy that apartment unless we first removed the built-in book shelves.
(We were deluded enough to believe that book shelves were a “selling point.”)
Recently, when my husband and I brought books and newspapers to a hospital ER waiting room, a young man warily asked us (as if he was dealing with crazy people) if we really planned to read “all that stuff.”
Yes, we did!

Scene from Twilight Zone's “Time Enough at Last” with Henry Bemis (Burgess Meredith) enjoying a book, before his eyeglasses are accidentally crushed.

A favorite The Twilight Zone episode deals with a book worm—Time Enough at Last (season one, episode 8).
This episode features Henry Bemis (Burgess Meredith) as a bank teller who “lives to read,” and cares little for human companionship.
(According to the IMDb trivia for this 1959 episode, of the 92 episodes that creator Rod Serling wrote, this episode was Mr. Serling’s personal favorite.)

One of the plot points in Time Enough at Last is that Mrs. Bemis (Jacqueline deWit) dislikes her husband’s love of books, and has actually destroyed some of them.
This lack of harmony is not the case in our family.
Both of us have loved libraries and reading since early childhood, and we are in complete agreement about “book love.”
We routinely point out interesting paragraphs to each other, and read them aloud.
We’re fans of book stores, catalogs, sales and festivals.

Hamlet (Lawrence Olivier) holding an open book.

When asked by Polonius what he was reading, Hamlet responded: “Words, words, words.”

My husband is something of an extrovert, and I’m very much an introvert.
Although Henry Bemis was an introvert, I’m sure that’s not a factor in loving books and reading.
For a while—after COVID hit, in 2020—I found it hard to pick up a book.
This change in my behavior made me realize that I was in an emotional crisis.
After a few months, I was back to reading every day again, and I knew that all would be well.
Reading books is one of the things that makes life worth living.

* According to researchers at the Australian National University, Estonians own an average of 128 books per household, with a third of respondents owning 350 books, or more. The average American household only owns about 29 books.